Update July 24th, 2012: not sure why, other than sheer stubbornness and a willingness to suffer and waste an uncountable number of evenings and weekends, but I did finally pass the CFA Level 1 exam. Below are some thoughts recorded the day after sitting the exam in June for the last time:
If I have one last piece of advice besides don’t be like me, and don’t get sick, it would be write the exam in a less busy test center. I also suggest you do a lot of practice problems such as these 29 I carefully selected and cooked up. My final suggestion is not to blog about your journey or experience as a CFA Candidate at least not until you successfully complete all three exams.
Not sure it went well enough. I definitely could have used another day or week to review things I supposedly read about… My biggest problem may have been lack of sleep, I don’t know if it was the stress, the strange bed, or my bad back, but I swear I hardly slept the night before. I stopped studying at 11pm and went to bed, but tossed and turned, finally I got up at 6 something and did some more practice problems.
Perhaps I should have written this blog post immediately after the exam, as I’m not sure I remember all my thoughts, but considering I was basically a zombie throughout the whole exam and had to drive North for my sister’s birthday party, plus the CFA Institute does not want you discussing what actually appeared on the exam, something folks in Victoria seemed to do the instant they were let out for lunch…
What the CFA Institute really doesn’t want is people getting an unfair advantage. You’re allowed to complain about CFA Institute policies online, you’re just not suppose to talk about specific questions, nor share information with people in other timezones who have yet to sit the exam. It was never my intention to write about anything specific to the exam I just wrote, but rather the process of preparing for the exam and the difficulties I’ve had.
The CFA Level 1 exam has a low pass rate. They never reveal your exact score or the exact score you need to pass and it likely changes from year to year. Years ago the buzz on the Internet was you needed to get over 70% correct on most every section with specific heavily weighted sections like Ethics and Financial Statement Analysis being must pass, while smaller sections like Portfolio Management or even Economics being less vital. I’ve written the exam more than once and have done well and less well in various sections, the material that most concerned me heading into this exam was Financial Statement Analysis. It is both the largest section and the one in which I have the most difficulty getting over 70% correct.
I managed to get over 70% correct in the last batch of practice problems I did but that seems to be cutting things a little close. I was averaging 66.67% on the FSA sections of practice exams leading up to June 2nd. The folks who make the practice exams preach that you should expect to do worse on the actual exam day due to stress, fatigue, stricter time constraints etc. So I decided to attempt my two weakest sections first, FSA and Fixed Income. I then planned to do the Ethics questions as it is also considered ‘must pass’ (must achieve 70+ %) by popular online opinion. In both sessions I thought I was doing alright for time over the first hour and a half or so. But both sessions I had to rush at the end.
Officially you have 1.5 minutes per question. Some questions take over 1.5 minutes to read or re-read for clarity. Others require significant button pressing, doubled if you want to verify your calculations. The first time I wrote the exam I made sure to read every official reading, but I didn’t do enough practice problems. Since then I’ve devoted much less time to the official readings and much more time to practice problems and unofficial study material. The weighting of the various sections is set in stone, but I spent a disproportionate amount of effort on the most challenging material, both leading up to the exam and during the exam. As a result my score in Economics or whatever section I attempted last may suffer.
I think I can achieve over 70% in every section, I just have not accomplished that on exam day. I can make excuses, the latest being my sudden inability to sleep or the 3+ hour drive down Island or whatever. I’m glad it is out of my life for a while, now I can feel less guilty about not studying all the time. Of course in a few weeks when I get my score I may feel even more guilt.
I’ve made much of my personal study materials available online and I’m thinking about typing up some if not all my many cue cards. The folks who create the exam definitely have a vested interest in seeing the pass rate remain low, more alarming is the number of people who pay to sit the exam but don’t show, this is most apparent at large test centers filled with empty but numbered desks. I guess people thought the 250-300 hours suggested studying time was in jest. Some questions are a case of memorization, others involve logic. Economics has approximately 1/6th of the reading material but is only worth about 1/10th of your score in Level 1, this makes it perhaps the most frustrating section.
For some of the exam questions the answer was on a cue card I made or I had seen a problem like that before, other times the question was not something I’d reviewed at all. In Level 1 all the questions are multiple choice and there are now only three answers to choose amongst. Often you can quickly eliminate one answer leaving you to him and haw, often for well over 1.5 minutes between the remaining two. Some questions do require a calculator, supposedly those are less numerous than they used to be. Sometimes the answer is as simple as one number divided by another, such as in the case of the standard error of the sample mean. The folks who design the exam are not above giving you superfluous information, see the bit above about having to spend more than a minute reading, or rereading a question. During the exam I took to underlining key words such as: semi-annual, most likely, least likely, or closest to. Sometimes these words are in italics, sometimes they are not.
For a question involving say the dividend discount model, it is basically one number divided by another number. Technically you need: dividend at time one, cost of capital, and growth rate. These are represented by d1, k, and g. There are many, many examples of how to make these questions trickier by providing information you don’t need, or requiring you to calculate d1, k, and g given d0, Rf, beta, ROE, dividend retention rate, etc. etc. Officially you only have 1.5 minutes per question so you need to get very fast at doing some styles of questions IMHO, in order to then have more time for questions which are more subtle or require a lot of reasoning. Sometimes you need more time to double and triple check your answer.
A frequent technique seen on the exam and in practice problems is not asking for the exact answer but the answer closest to the ones provided. There is probably some small print somewhere that I read which instructs you to maintain four decimal point accuracy, but the official answers will often be rounded. It is possible to do a question correctly then get an answer larger or smaller than any of the choices. This is another place where you lose time recalculating everything when in fact you have done the question correctly the first time. I don’t know what to advise other than having enough confidence not to recalculate or doing what I did and prioritizing certain sections so that I have time to redo calculations on the sections I’m most worried about.
I don’t really have any more advice, now those people who actually showed up and sat the exam wait for the results in approximately 8 weeks apparently. Level 1 Candidates can rewrite in December, other levels have to wait a full calendar year.